Wednesday, October 9, 2013

English 1A: The 3 Last Paragraphs

Colors and recreations can affect the mood of children negatively if they do have hold of them. Many children are attracted to bright colors. Studies have shown that "color can affect mood." states Mark Twain in Colour and Children. At early age the kids in elementary schools in Anacostia take notice of the dullness their schools project. These kids think of ways of bettering their schools by adding color to "the classrooms. [Being more specific] Blue and white." (Kozol 218) they are terrified by the sadness their schools show, which they shouldn't because it is not their role and it's unhealthy for a kid to worry of such circumstances at early age. The color blue, according to David Johnson's article, is "Peaceful, tranquil blue causes the body to produce calming chemicals...". The kids show concern for their schools, which makes understandable why these little children look for ways to find calm. At other schools, Gourdy Elementary in Chicago for instance, the buildings are "nonetheless depressing." (Kozol 77) They lack playgrounds, swings and jungle gyms and if they were to benefit from it they'd possibly not "cry out for something more... "( Kozol 78). Poor public schools, due to lack of funding, tend to be the least cared of, they lack supplies but worse of all they lack the interest of a child; the buildings lack vivid environments for the children. Playgrounds might not be essential to a school's staff but for kids they are to the kids. Whether kids go "home light- or heavy-hearted [it all] depends on what happened during play time." "recess is the emotional core of [the children's] school day" (Bernstein,  David); mentioned in The Power of Playground. Playgrounds make the children feel joyous and content. Yet, when these are taken away or not present or at reach, kids feel the sad, blue, inactive, the opposite. The absence of colors and jungle gyms, which are typically not obtained at the poor schools, tend to bring down a child's emotions.
When there's zero or poor supplies to provide in schools the students feel less motivated and to a smaller extent inspired. I, personally, experienced my soccer-mates' little enthusiasm in continuing in the team because we were offered crumbs. Our school's sport teams had no equipment especially for soccer, which was the sport that I had involved with, and the little it did was not under no condition to be used. The ladders had knots that held them together, the uniforms' numbers weren't completely taped, the soccer balls were literally falling in pieces, the field was technically a pond, in the winter, which most of the time dragged us down and held us from running. The school had a turf field but it was saved either for football, track or varsity soccer while we were excluded; they were the school's priority. During practice, under the rain, I often saw the disappointment on my mates, nothing would come out of their verbally, but you wouldn't need for them to out-pour their thoughts, their faces would state everything their minds did. We weren't going anywhere far with what we had that was a fact. So, as we continued with the everyday practice their motivation would start to drastically disappear. Alike a plague, I started to sicken as well. I lost interest because it seemed like we weren't given at most the basic. I lost motivation in getting enrolled in the sports that held that specific school. Several other girls, almost most of the team, we can say, lost their motivation too and quit. When there's nothing being offered when there’s a no desire to of trade in. The point of giving up everything for nothing in return sounds somewhat unfair to many of us, so we tend to get discouraged. Therefore, an absence of inducement is created when encourage (or material) itself it's not proposed.

Contribution of materials influence the consciousness a child, when they're not contributed it makes the individual feel less appreciated. "Her eyes are bright with anger. [And asks] 'Why are we treated like this?' " (Kozol 186) is a question that echoes the conscious of a teenager and many more who experience the same recognition of worth. The useless books, collapsing buildings and other matters make these individuals unappreciated and treated unfairly. Compare to what the rich receive in the suburbs these poor people have nothing. The poor notice that their competitors are treated superior to them when they all belong to the same kingdom. They notice that there's a dual system that works district schools and local districts by segregating them, although segregation for them is not a beneficial. As much as the rich and system try to blindfold the truth they notice, and coactively reality makes the poor feel less, and although they shouldn't, the feeling can't be avoided. Un-appreciation can be avoided when there’s nothing offered.

No comments:

Post a Comment